0 comments
Published Friday, February 29, 2008 by Alex Lamers.
A Tale of Two Numerical Models
Chase Target: Seymour, TX.
Time to Target: (From Norman OK) 3 hours
Plan of Action: Head southwest on I-44 to US277/82. Estimated departure time would be around 9 to 10 AM, given expected storm initiation shortly after the noon hour.Two different models would present two entirely different possibilities as far as the potential severe weather event on Sunday. The GFS certainly would present greater concern, for its stronger mid to upper tropospheric flow over the warm sector contributes to much larger looping hodographs and thus stronger low-level wind shear. The NAM presents two areas of stronger shear, one to the north across Oklahoma and Kansas, and one to the south in the southern half of Texas with the butterflying jet structure. In fact the NAM puts upper level winds in the hole over Northwest Texas below 30 knots. This seems slightly impractical. I will break down what I think will happen and why I think each model is wrong on certain aspects. In any case, the differences among the models certainly casts doubt upon any chase potential.
The situation is incredibly complex and any variations will throw a wrench into the mix. Anyways, back to Sunday. It appears as though there will be a nice Gulf air mass surging north albeit modifying as it goes along. This is the first difference that is noted. The NAM tends to want to surge the mT air mass as far west as the New Mexico border, while the GFS hangs it up somewhere in the West-Central Texas rolling plains and the Edwards Plateau. I would imagine the GFS would be more reasonable in this regard for several reasons. (1) the persistent drought and dry soil and vegetation across the western half of Texas should allow for relatively quick modification and drying of the air mass, especially prior to the bulk of the spring green-up AND (2) low level cyclogenesis should provide more of a westerly component to the winds off the higher elevations in New Mexico and into far West Texas. Therefore, we could see compressional warming and some drier air emanating from the plateaus. As a result, I would expect the dryline to sharpen up somewhere along the edge of the Caprock escarpment.
The "main show", as far as coverage of convection goes, will be along the cold front which should reach a BVO-CDS line by 00Z Monday. Storms will initially fire along the cold front in the early afternoon in Northwest Oklahoma, but warm, moist air mass will likely advect up and over the cold dome and produce a backbuilding effect. The cold front will be surging southeast faster than mean storm motion IN THAT DIRECTION, which will allow the cold front to overtake the storms by late in the afternoon, allowing them to become progressively more elevated. Therefore, I don't see much of a tornado threat in Oklahoma, mainly just a marginal hail threat.
Further south, things become more interesting. There are several factors to consider. The first is a relatively stable environment caused by a pronounced elevated mixed layer that will hopefully erode as the late morning and early afternoon hours wear on. The source region for this air would be the arid Mexican plateaus. However, as the afternoon progresses, a shortwave trough is progged to eject northeastward from ~Southeast New Mexico to just northwest of the DFW metro area. The result should be a cooling of the layer and perhaps some induced vertical motion...both would act to destabilize the environment.
Interestingly enough, both of the models tend to agree on where the best instability will be in the afternoon hours. They project the best instability to be over Western North Texas, which makes sense as coldest air aloft will be able to overlap with the relatively homogeneous warm air over the entire warm sector. Because logic and all the models support the most unstable surface-based CAPE to reside over Western North Texas, this puts it at the top of my list as a general chasing target.
Concerns exist then about several things: shear and timing/initiation. I believe the NAM is woefully underdoing the amount of vertical shear because of the nearly calm winds it is depicting aloft. I would think bulk shear values would at least be in the 25-30 knot range, which would be marginally supportive of supercells. If one believes the GFS, then bulk shear could be as high as 50 knots with 0-1km SRH values approaching 300m2s-2.
So what will happen? Right now I'm thinking increasingly elevated storms will occur during the afternoon and evening over Oklahoma behind the surface cold front. There should be a low cloud deck during the morning over most of the warm sector, but this will erode near the dryline with mixing influences, etc. Further east, strong warm advection will persist as the boundary layer remains more decoupled and thus I think we'll see the soupy strands of weak-moderate elevated convection developing in the late morning and early afternoon from Southern Oklahoma into Central Texas. Not much should arise out of this, until stronger height falls arrive overnight to cool the column and destabilize the environment, which would then support more vigorous convection. This pretty much restricts chasing opportunities close to the dry line where hopefully clouds will clear out later in the morning, and sufficient shear and instability will exist to support supercells. Best overlap of shear and instability seems to be over Western North Texas so at the moment, that's what I have down as a target area.
Hopefully models converge on a solution soon! It would at least be nice to pin down a general area where initial convection will occur and the best threat will be, but current model spread makes that a bit difficult.